Keyword summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Fraud Case results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (8,602 of 33,961 keywords). This Minnesota Fraud Case is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Minnesota Fraud Case
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠75%Minnesota Fraud Case (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Minnesota Fraud Case attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Minnesota Fraud Case vs sitewide
Minnesota Fraud Case attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos