Keyword summary
4%1 analyzed article/video1,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Md Anderson Cancer Center Houston results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 1,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,637 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (32,918 of 33,360 keywords). This Md Anderson Cancer Center Houston is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Md Anderson Cancer Center Houston
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Md Anderson Cancer Center Houston attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Md Anderson Cancer Center Houston vs sitewide
Md Anderson Cancer Center Houston attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.