Keyword summary
8%1 analyzed article/video1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Komoda results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 1,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (39,348 of 44,281 keywords). This Matthew Komoda is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Matthew Komoda
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Matthew Komoda attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Matthew Komoda vs sitewide
Matthew Komoda attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.