Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Alford results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 2,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (14,245 of 28,625 keywords). This Mark Alford is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Mark Alford
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Mark Alford attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Mark Alford vs sitewide
Mark Alford attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.