Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marine Mammal Protection Act results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,351 of 28,628 keywords). This Marine Mammal Protection Act is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Marine Mammal Protection Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠33%Marine Mammal Protection Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,036
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Marine Mammal Protection Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Marine Mammal Protection Act vs sitewide
Marine Mammal Protection Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos