Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Manhattan Supreme Court results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 3,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,072 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Manhattan Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Manhattan Supreme Court
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,072
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Manhattan Supreme Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Manhattan Supreme Court vs sitewide
Manhattan Supreme Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.