Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 226 hits. Analysis detected 1,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 735 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 29,076 keywords). This Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 735
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law vs sitewide
Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos