Keyword summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Amy Coney Barrett Testimony results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 1,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,553 of 26,830 keywords). This Justice Amy Coney Barrett Testimony is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett Testimony
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠87%Justice Amy Coney Barrett Testimony (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,308
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Justice Amy Coney Barrett Testimony attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Justice Amy Coney Barrett Testimony vs sitewide
Justice Amy Coney Barrett Testimony attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos