Keyword summary
â 12%1 analyzed article/video332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julio Sosa Celis results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 671 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of â 60% (10,890 of 26,596 keywords). This Julio Sosa Celis is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Julio Sosa Celis
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Julio Sosa Celis attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Julio Sosa Celis vs sitewide
Julio Sosa Celis attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.