Keyword summary
â 0%1 analyzed article/video1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Wertz results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 825 hits. Analysis detected 5,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of â 66% (12,771 of 37,536 keywords). This Julia Wertz is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Julia Wertz
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Julia Wertz attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Julia Wertz vs sitewide
Julia Wertz attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.