Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Misconduct results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,220 hits. Analysis detected 10,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,895 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,978 of 29,136 keywords). This Judicial Misconduct is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Judicial Misconduct
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠49%Judicial Misconduct (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,895
Article count: 3
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Misconduct attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Misconduct vs sitewide
Judicial Misconduct attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos