Keyword summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Interpretation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Straw Man, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 924 hits. Analysis detected 5,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,025 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,287 of 32,033 keywords). This Judicial Interpretation is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Judicial Interpretation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠93%Judicial Interpretation (selected)9%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,025
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Interpretation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Interpretation vs sitewide
Judicial Interpretation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos