Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Ethics results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,927 hits. Analysis detected 11,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (32,401 of 35,883 keywords). This Judicial Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Judicial Ethics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠10%Judicial Ethics (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,760
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Ethics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Ethics vs sitewide
Judicial Ethics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos