Keyword summary
82%1 analyzed article/video899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Journal Of The American Medical Association results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 651 hits. Analysis detected 3,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,697 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 82% (5,574 of 29,940 keywords). This Journal Of The American Medical Association is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Journal Of The American Medical Association
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Self-Driving Cars1%
0%Self Driving Cars1%
0%Bastille Day1%
0%Borders1%
0%French Revolution1%
82%Journal Of The American Medical Association (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,697
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Journal Of The American Medical Association attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Journal Of The American Medical Association vs sitewide
Journal Of The American Medical Association attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos