Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Mellencamp results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 984 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,146 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,946 of 28,569 keywords). This John Mellencamp is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
John Mellencamp
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
John Mellencamp attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
John Mellencamp vs sitewide
John Mellencamp attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.