Keyword summary
â 97%1 analyzed article/video342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Walkinshaw results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of â 77% (6,162 of 26,159 keywords). This James Walkinshaw is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
James Walkinshaw
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
James Walkinshaw attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
James Walkinshaw vs sitewide
James Walkinshaw attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.