Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These James Tinsley results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 3,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 28,367 keywords). This James Tinsley is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
James Tinsley
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
James Tinsley attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
James Tinsley vs sitewide
James Tinsley attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.