BS Summary: These Iran Threats results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 800 hits. Analysis detected 5,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (9,106 of 23,332 keywords). This Iran Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Iran Threats
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Threats attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Threats vs All Other Publications
Iran Threats attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.