BS Summary: These Iran-Sanctions results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 1,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,629 of 23,005 keywords). This Iran-Sanctions is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Iran-Sanctions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wholegrains0%
⁠0%Weed0%
⁠0%Wang Wen0%
⁠0%Vegetation Fire0%
⁠0%U S House0%
⁠76%Iran-Sanctions (selected)5%
⁠100%Reuven Carlyle60%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,856
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran-Sanctions attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran-Sanctions vs All Other Publications
Iran-Sanctions attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.