Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These International Monetary Fund results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 2,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 26,640 keywords). This International Monetary Fund is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
International Monetary Fund
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
International Monetary Fund attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
International Monetary Fund vs sitewide
International Monetary Fund attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.