Keyword summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Humanitarian Law results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 3,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (4,075 of 33,219 keywords). This International Humanitarian Law is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
International Humanitarian Law
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠88%International Humanitarian Law (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,680
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
International Humanitarian Law attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
International Humanitarian Law vs sitewide
International Humanitarian Law attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos