Keyword summary
14%1 analyzed article/video2,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interfaith Justice Advocacy Group results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,072 hits. Analysis detected 3,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,078 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,277 of 37,536 keywords). This Interfaith Justice Advocacy Group is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Interfaith Justice Advocacy Group
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Interfaith Justice Advocacy Group attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Interfaith Justice Advocacy Group vs sitewide
Interfaith Justice Advocacy Group attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.