Keyword summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institute For Justice results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 3,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,430 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (23,727 of 26,641 keywords). This Institute For Justice is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Institute For Justice
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠11%Institute For Justice (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,430
Article count: 3
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Institute For Justice attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Institute For Justice vs sitewide
Institute For Justice attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos