Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indycar results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 1,413 hits. Analysis detected 5,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,104 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (9,041 of 28,615 keywords). This Indycar is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Indycar
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Indycar attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Indycar vs sitewide
Indycar attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.