Keyword summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humphrey’s Executor V. United States results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 645 hits. Analysis detected 5,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,669 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,980 of 31,729 keywords). This Humphrey’s Executor V. United States is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Humphrey’s Executor V. United States
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠75%Humphrey’s Executor V. United States (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,669
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Humphrey’s Executor V. United States attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Humphrey’s Executor V. United States vs sitewide
Humphrey’s Executor V. United States attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos