Keyword summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Supplies results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 1,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,920 of 29,242 keywords). This Humanitarian Supplies is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Humanitarian Supplies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠56%Humanitarian Supplies (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Humanitarian Supplies attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Humanitarian Supplies vs sitewide
Humanitarian Supplies attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos