Keyword summary
82%5 analyzed articles/videos2,761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Watch results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 2,539 hits. Analysis detected 16,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,816 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (15,145 of 27,379 keywords). This Human Rights Watch is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Human Rights Watch
Keyword details
Total words: 14,816
Article count: 5
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights Watch attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights Watch vs sitewide
Human Rights Watch attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.