Keyword summary
ā 95%1 analyzed article/video1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Tribunal results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 652 hits. Analysis detected 3,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,135 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 65% (10,291 of 28,627 keywords). This Human Rights Tribunal is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Human Rights Tribunal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Anthony Broadwater1%
ā 0%Alice Sebold1%
ā 65%Human Rights Tribunal (selected)4%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,135
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights Tribunal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights Tribunal vs sitewide
Human Rights Tribunal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos