Keyword summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Groups results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (10,923 of 27,828 keywords). This Human Rights Groups is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Human Rights Groups
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠61%Human Rights Groups (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights Groups attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights Groups vs sitewide
Human Rights Groups attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos