Keyword summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights And International Courts results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 1,258 hits. Analysis detected 6,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,464 of 27,295 keywords). This Human Rights And International Courts is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Human Rights And International Courts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠84%Human Rights And International Courts (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,904
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights And International Courts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights And International Courts vs sitewide
Human Rights And International Courts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos