BS Summary: These Human Rights & Civil Liberties results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 4,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (18,792 of 23,396 keywords). This Human Rights & Civil Liberties is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Human Rights & Civil Liberties
Keyword details
Total words: 6,496
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights & Civil Liberties attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights & Civil Liberties vs All Other Publications
Human Rights & Civil Liberties attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.