Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Elephant Conflict results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 3,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,515 of 28,625 keywords). This Human Elephant Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Human Elephant Conflict
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠18%Human Elephant Conflict (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,092
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Elephant Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Elephant Conflict vs sitewide
Human Elephant Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos