Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Ethics Committee results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 784 hits. Analysis detected 2,490 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,859 of 28,615 keywords). This House Ethics Committee is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
House Ethics Committee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠38%House Ethics Committee (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,704
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
House Ethics Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
House Ethics Committee vs sitewide
House Ethics Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos