Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These House Democratic Caucus results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 2,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 28,232 keywords). This House Democratic Caucus is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
House Democratic Caucus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%House Democratic Caucus (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
House Democratic Caucus attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
House Democratic Caucus vs sitewide
House Democratic Caucus attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos