Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hong Grace Peng results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 582 hits. Analysis detected 3,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (12,530 of 28,625 keywords). This Hong Grace Peng is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Hong Grace Peng
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hong Grace Peng attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hong Grace Peng vs sitewide
Hong Grace Peng attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.