Keyword summary
â 95%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hind Rajab Foundation results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 3,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of â 89% (4,158 of 34,925 keywords). This Hind Rajab Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Hind Rajab Foundation
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hind Rajab Foundation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hind Rajab Foundation vs sitewide
Hind Rajab Foundation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.