Keyword summary
93%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heights Investment Fund results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 1,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,010 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (9,627 of 29,242 keywords). This Heights Investment Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Heights Investment Fund
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Heights Investment Fund attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Heights Investment Fund vs sitewide
Heights Investment Fund attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.