Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hearings House Of Representatives Politics results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,062 hits. Analysis detected 5,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,605 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,774 of 28,615 keywords). This Hearings House Of Representatives Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Hearings House Of Representatives Politics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠56%Hearings House Of Representatives Politics (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,605
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hearings House Of Representatives Politics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hearings House Of Representatives Politics vs sitewide
Hearings House Of Representatives Politics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos