Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hangzhou Tea Harvest results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 728 hits. Analysis detected 4,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (21,000 of 29,241 keywords). This Hangzhou Tea Harvest is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Hangzhou Tea Harvest
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠29%Hangzhou Tea Harvest (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,712
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hangzhou Tea Harvest attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hangzhou Tea Harvest vs sitewide
Hangzhou Tea Harvest attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos