Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gubernatorial Debate results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 580 hits. Analysis detected 3,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 28,663 keywords). This Gubernatorial Debate is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gubernatorial Debate
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Gubernatorial Debate attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Gubernatorial Debate vs sitewide
Gubernatorial Debate attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.