BS Summary: These Greenpeace results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 181 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (22,286 of 22,926 keywords). This Greenpeace is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Greenpeace
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wholegrains0%
⁠0%Weed0%
⁠0%Wang Wen0%
⁠0%Vegetation Fire0%
⁠0%U S House0%
⁠3%Greenpeace (selected)2%
⁠100%Reuven Carlyle60%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,068
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Greenpeace attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Greenpeace vs All Other Publications
Greenpeace attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.