Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greediest Generation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 1,297 hits. Analysis detected 5,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,600 of 37,536 keywords). This Greediest Generation is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Greediest Generation
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Greediest Generation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Greediest Generation vs sitewide
Greediest Generation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.