Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video5,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater Houston Coalition For Justice results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,460 hits. Analysis detected 3,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,226 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,990 of 37,536 keywords). This Greater Houston Coalition For Justice is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice vs sitewide
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.