Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video5,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater Houston Coalition For Justice results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,460 hits. Analysis detected 3,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,226 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,990 of 37,536 keywords). This Greater Houston Coalition For Justice is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 17,226
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice vs sitewide
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos