Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goldman Sachs Group Inc results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 2,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,591 of 26,210 keywords). This Goldman Sachs Group Inc is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠75%Goldman Sachs Group Inc (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,940
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Goldman Sachs Group Inc attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Goldman Sachs Group Inc vs sitewide
Goldman Sachs Group Inc attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos