Keyword summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gazprom Neft results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (10,765 of 27,298 keywords). This Gazprom Neft is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Gazprom Neft
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠61%Gazprom Neft (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Gazprom Neft attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Gazprom Neft vs sitewide
Gazprom Neft attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos