Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Funding For Israel results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 2,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 28,998 keywords). This Funding For Israel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Funding For Israel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Funding For Israel (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Funding For Israel attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Funding For Israel vs sitewide
Funding For Israel attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos