Keyword summary
24%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Free And Fair Elections results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 314 faulty-reasoning hits from 400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,804 of 28,341 keywords). This Free And Fair Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Free And Fair Elections
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Free And Fair Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Free And Fair Elections vs sitewide
Free And Fair Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.