Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Formal Fallacy results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Circular Reasoning, and Genetic Fallacy, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 677 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,246 of 28,616 keywords). This Formal Fallacy is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Formal Fallacy
Keyword details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Formal Fallacy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Formal Fallacy vs sitewide
Formal Fallacy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.