Keyword summary
ā 5%1 analyzed article/video343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forest Service Employees results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 668 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (8,541 of 28,665 keywords). This Forest Service Employees is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Forest Service Employees
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Borders1%
ā 0%French Revolution1%
ā 71%Forest Service Employees (selected)5%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Forest Service Employees attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Forest Service Employees vs sitewide
Forest Service Employees attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos