Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foraging results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 784 hits. Analysis detected 7,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,546 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,250 of 28,615 keywords). This Foraging is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Foraging
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠47%Foraging (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,546
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Foraging attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Foraging vs sitewide
Foraging attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos